New Balance Fresh Foam 1080 vs HOKA Clifton: Which Running Shoe Is Right for You?

Share

Compare the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v14 and HOKA Clifton 9, two premium cushioned trainers. Find which delivers the ride you want.

Bob BodilyBob Bodily
6 min readShoes

Quick Hits

  • 1080 offers traditional high cushioning; Clifton provides HOKA's lighter max-cushion feel
  • 1080 has more width options (narrow to extra-wide); Clifton limited to standard and wide
  • Clifton is lighter (9.1 oz vs 10.1 oz men's) with lower 5mm drop
  • Both priced similarly at $165 (1080) and $145 (Clifton)
  • 1080 feels more traditional; Clifton has distinctive rocker geometry
New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v14 comparison
New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v14
HOKA Clifton 9 comparison
HOKA Clifton 9

Head-to-head breakdown from our lab-tested shoe database.

The New Balance Fresh Foam 1080 and HOKA Clifton are two of the most popular premium cushioned trainers, each representing their brand's philosophy of comfortable running. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right ride.

Quick Verdict

Choose the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v14 if you want traditional plush cushioning with excellent width options. It offers proven comfort in a more conventional package.

Choose the HOKA Clifton 9 if you want lighter weight cushioning with HOKA's signature smooth ride. It packs substantial foam into a surprisingly nimble shoe.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v14 Overview

The 1080 is New Balance's flagship cushioned trainer, designed for runners who prioritize comfort over everything else. It uses Fresh Foam X technology for a soft, plush ride.

Key Features:

  • Fresh Foam X midsole
  • 6mm heel-to-toe drop
  • 10.1 oz (men's) / 8.8 oz (women's)
  • 34mm heel / 28mm forefoot stack height
  • Hypoknit upper

Best For:

  • Runners prioritizing plush cushioning
  • Those who need wide or narrow fit options
  • Long runs and easy miles
  • Traditional cushioning enthusiasts

Pros:

  • Plush, comfortable cushioning
  • Excellent fit options (narrow to extra-wide)
  • Comfortable upper construction
  • High durability

Cons:

  • Heavy for a premium trainer
  • Less responsive than modern alternatives
  • Traditional feel may seem dated to some

HOKA Clifton 9 Overview

The Clifton is HOKA's most popular shoe—the gateway to their max-cushion lineup. It delivers substantial cushioning at surprisingly light weight with signature rocker geometry.

Key Features:

  • Compression-molded EVA foam
  • 5mm heel-to-toe drop
  • 9.1 oz (men's) / 7.8 oz (women's)
  • 36mm heel / 31mm forefoot stack height
  • Engineered mesh upper

Best For:

  • Runners wanting cushioning without weight
  • Those who like HOKA's rocker geometry
  • Daily training and long runs
  • Runners seeking a lighter cushioned feel

Pros:

  • Light for the cushion level
  • Smooth rocker transitions
  • Comfortable daily trainer
  • Versatile for multiple paces

Cons:

  • Outsole durability concerns
  • Narrower toe box than competitors
  • Limited width options

Head-to-Head Comparison

Cushioning

Both shoes offer substantial cushioning but deliver it differently. The 1080's Fresh Foam X feels traditionally soft—it compresses under impact and provides a plush landing.

The Clifton's foam is engineered to feel light despite high volume. It cushions through geometry (the rocker) as much as material softness. The ride feels springy rather than plush.

Winner: Tie — 1080 for soft plush; Clifton for light cushioning.

Weight

The Clifton weighs 9.1 oz for men and 7.8 oz for women. The 1080 comes in at 10.1 oz for men and 8.8 oz for women. That's a full ounce difference—significant in cushioned shoes.

The Clifton's lighter weight makes it feel more agile despite having a higher stack height. This is HOKA's signature achievement.

Winner: HOKA Clifton — An ounce lighter is meaningful.

Durability

The 1080 has better durability due to New Balance's denser foam formulation and more extensive outsole rubber coverage. Expect 400-500 miles.

The Clifton's outsole is a known weak point. Many runners report exposed foam and reduced traction around 250-300 miles. The shoe remains cushioned but loses grip.

Winner: New Balance 1080 — Longer-lasting construction.

Responsiveness

Neither shoe is designed for speed, but both can handle varied paces. The Clifton's lighter weight and rocker geometry make it feel more responsive for uptempo running.

The 1080 feels more consistent across paces but doesn't have the same snap when you want to speed up.

Winner: HOKA Clifton — Rocker and weight advantage.

Price/Value

The 1080 costs MSRP: $165; the Clifton costs MSRP: $145. The MSRP: $20 difference is notable, with the Clifton offering better value if its fit works for you.

The 1080's superior durability somewhat offsets its higher price over time.

Winner: HOKA Clifton — Better price for most runners.

Fit

The 1080 crushes the Clifton in fit options. Available in narrow, standard, wide, and extra-wide, it accommodates virtually any foot shape. New Balance also tends to run wider overall.

The Clifton only comes in standard and wide, and HOKA's toe boxes are known to run narrow. Runners with wider feet often struggle with Clifton fit.

Winner: New Balance 1080 — Far better fit options.

Comparison Table

Feature New Balance 1080 v14 HOKA Clifton 9
Price MSRP: $165 MSRP: $145
Weight (men's) 10.1 oz 9.1 oz
Weight (women's) 8.8 oz 7.8 oz
Heel-to-toe drop 6mm 5mm
Stack height (heel) 34mm 36mm
Stack height (forefoot) 28mm 31mm
Cushion level High High
Best for Plush comfort Light cushioning
Durability High Moderate
Width options Narrow to Extra-Wide Standard, Wide

Choose the New Balance 1080 If...

  • You have wide, narrow, or hard-to-fit feet
  • Traditional, plush cushioning appeals to you
  • Durability is important for high-mileage training
  • You prefer a more conventional running shoe feel
  • You want a proven, reliable daily trainer
  • HOKA's rocker geometry doesn't appeal to you

Choose the HOKA Clifton If...

  • You want cushioning without weight
  • HOKA's rocker geometry sounds appealing
  • Your feet fit standard or wide widths comfortably
  • You prefer a lighter, more nimble feel
  • Budget matters and MSRP: $145 is preferable to MSRP: $165
  • You want to try the shoe that defines modern cushioned running

Final Verdict

The New Balance Fresh Foam 1080 and HOKA Clifton are both excellent cushioned trainers that approach comfort differently. The 1080 is traditional and accommodating; the Clifton is innovative and light.

The 1080 is the better choice for runners who need excellent fit options or prefer traditional cushioning. Its width range is unmatched, and its durability makes it a smart long-term investment. If you have wider feet or have struggled with HOKA's fit, the 1080 is the obvious choice.

The Clifton is the better choice for runners who prioritize light weight and like HOKA's unique ride feel. It delivers remarkable cushioning at a weight that lets you forget you're in a max-cushion shoe. If the fit works for you, it's an exceptional daily trainer at a slightly better price.

Try both if possible. The ride differences are significant enough that preference varies dramatically between runners. Both are excellent—your feet will tell you which is right.


Looking for more detailed information? Check out our individual reviews: New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v14 Review and HOKA Clifton 9 Review.

Key Takeaway

Choose the New Balance Fresh Foam 1080 for traditional plush cushioning and excellent width options. Pick the HOKA Clifton for lighter weight cushioning with smooth rocker transitions. Both are premium daily trainers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which shoe has better cushioning?
Both provide excellent cushioning but with different characters. The 1080 has traditional high cushioning that feels soft and consistent. The Clifton has HOKA's signature lightweight-cushion feel—substantial foam that doesn't feel heavy. The 1080 is plusher; the Clifton is lighter. Neither is objectively better—it depends on your preference.
Is the HOKA rocker hard to adjust to?
Most runners adapt to HOKA's rocker geometry quickly—within 2-3 runs. The Clifton's rocker is moderate compared to other HOKAs and promotes smooth heel-to-toe transitions. Some runners love it immediately; others need a brief adjustment period. If you've never run in HOKAs, try them at a store first if possible.
Which is better for wide feet?
The New Balance 1080 is significantly better for wide feet. It's available in narrow, standard, wide, and extra-wide options, while the Clifton only comes in standard and wide. New Balance also tends to run slightly wider in the toe box even in standard width.
Which shoe lasts longer?
The 1080 typically lasts longer due to New Balance's denser Fresh Foam and more durable outsole rubber. Expect 400-500 miles from the 1080 and 300-400 from the Clifton. The Clifton's lighter weight comes with some durability trade-off.
Can these shoes handle long runs?
Both are excellent for long runs. The 1080's traditional cushioning provides consistent protection over many miles. The Clifton's lighter weight and rocker geometry can make long runs feel easier by promoting efficient turnover. Many runners specifically use these shoes for their longest efforts.

References

  1. New Balance product specifications
  2. HOKA product specifications
  3. Running shoe research

Send to a friend

Know someone training for a race? Share this with their long-run buddy.